Time for a Reset in European Security and Defence

In this edition of the European Council Experts’ Debrief, our experts focus on the theme of security and defence. We asked eleven experts to respond to the following question, formulated by TEPSA Secretary-General Jim Cloos and Executive Director Mariam Khotenashvili: “In view of the multiple new threats in a rapidly changing world, the effects of the Russian war on Ukraine, and growing uncertainties about the US commitment to European security, the time has come for a qualitative leap towards the objectives outlined in Article 42 TEU. What should be the key ingredients of such a reset? How could it best be ensured and operationalised, in terms of EU internal structures, resources, and ambition? Should the United Kingdom be associated to the process towards a European common defence, and how? What should the future role of NATO be? Do you consider that the Strategic Agenda adopted by the European Council at its June meeting is an adequate first response to these questions?“

As the European Union increasingly seeks to assert itself in a difficult geopolitical world, the question of how to ensure European security and defence has become more and more prominent. The context of Europe’s hard security having been ensured by NATO since the 1950s, a setup in which the role of the United States is crucial, has clashed with the current reality of new threats emerging in a rapidly changing world and of Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine. With a potential second Trump Presidency in America, the question of Europe making its own way in security and defence must be addressed.

In addition to the foreword by TEPSA Secretary-General Jim Cloos, expert contributors to this edition include: 

  • Claude-France Arnould, European Defence Agency, Belgium & French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and French institute of International Relations, France
  • Daniel Fiott, Centre for Security, Diplomacy and Strategy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium & Real Instituto Elcano, Spain
  • Tyyne Karjalainen, Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Finland
  • Robert Madelin, FIPRA International, United Kingdom
  • Hennadiy Maksak, Ukrainian Prism, Ukraine
  • Aleksandra Palkova, Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Latvia
  • Nicoletta Pirozzi, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Italy
  • Wojciech Przybylski, Visegrad Insight & Res Publica Foundation, Poland
  • Kristi Raik, International Centre for Defence and Security, Estonia
  • Luigi Scazzieri, Centre for European Reform, Belgium
  • Paul Taylor, European Policy Centre, Belgium
TEPSA-logo
CERV Acknowlegments (Co-Finacing)

Co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

More Policy Advice